Actors, Stages, and Scripts

First Draft Coalition[s]

So, who are the “responsible” journalists who should be anointed to regulate what the world’s public gets to see and hear? For that Orwellian task, a kind of Ministry of Truth has been set up by Google (supposedly formed in 2015, after Ukraine scenarios,) called the First Draft Coalition, which touts itself as a collection of 30 major news and technology companies, including [Facebook, Twitter,] the Times and Post, tackling “fake news” and creating a platform to decide which stories [or narratives or scripts] are questionable and which ones aren’t.

“I have watched incredulous as the CIA’s blatant Lie has grown and grown as a media story – blatant because the CIA has made no attempt whatsoever to substantiate it.  There is no Russian involvement in the leaks of emails showing Clinton’s corruption.”  Craig Murray, the former UK ambassador to Uzbekistan . . . called the CIA claims “bullshit,” adding: “They are absolutely making it up.”  “I know who leaked them,” Murray said.  “I’ve met the person who leaked them, and they are certainly not Russian and it’s an insiderIt’s a leak, not a hack; the two are different things.”

PropOrNot Provides the Spark

[T]he Hillary Clinton presidential campaign [DNC, etc.]: Already [especially since the leaks, and after a nationwide rigging scandal that the MSM would never focus on], Russian hacking was the centerpiece of the argument.  Less than three weeks after Clinton’s defeat, The Washington Post’s Craig Timberg published a dubiously sourced report headlined, “Russian Propaganda Effort Helped Spread ‘Fake News.’”  The article hyped up a McCarthyite effort by a shadowy, anonymously run organization called PropOrNot to Blacklist some 200 American media outlets as Russian “online propaganda.”

[Actors] Committee to Investigate Russia: “We Are At War”

Acts of Rachel Maddow: All Russia. All The Time.

Acts of CNN to Olbermann to . . .

NBC News, to Claim Russia Supports Tulsi Gabbard, Relies on Firm
Just Caught Fabricating Russia Data for the Democratic Party

“But the whole story was a sham: the only ‘experts’ cited by NBC in support of its key claim was the firm, New Knowledge, that just got caught fabricating Russian troll accounts on behalf of the Democratic Party.”  “New Knowledge boasted of its fabrications: ‘We orchestrated
an elaborate ‘false flag’ operation that planted the idea that the [Roy] Moore campaign was amplified on social media by a Russian botnet.’”

“Even more hilariously, the source [was] . . . New Knowledge.”

As with the First Draft Coalition, there is nothing hilarious about it.
Step by step, as scripted and staged, this is the next planned point:
NBC News, world stage, boldly crammed into everyone’s faces.  It is
no longer a “McCarthyite environment of Russia hysteria”; it is now, blatantly, beyond.  “This article is of course [obscenely] absurd.”  Yes, and this is where/when they know that most know what is actually taking place.  It is time, their time, the very time “they” concocted.  And, anyone who dares stand for or speak Truth to Power will be targetedobviously, ruthlessly, soullessly.

NBC -et al - Tulsi Gabbard 2019

Aaron Maté on Russiagate

Aaron Maté: I’ll never forget Maddow did a segment where she’s talking about some alleged Russian trolls interfering on Bernie Sanders’ fan club page, and she called it international warfare against our country, and so on.  And I’ll never forget Rob Reiner, who helped set up this neocon Hollywood group called the Committee to Investigate Russia.  Rob Reiner on MSNBC said that the Russians are in our bloodstream.

Yes, much (truth) was (eventually) undoubtedly revealed.
Yet, the (ongoing) campaign was (still) a Total Success (in many facets).

Reality: Newscasters Agree: [Merry Christmas!]

It’s not our job.  Then, how damned long has this been a Fact?
We are not investigators.”  Then, what the hell are you, now?

[Ray McGovern’s article wherein the last two quotes were referenced/linked were targeted by malware, and blamed on Russians – further cementing this point of undoubted history.]

15 Responses to Actors, Stages, and Scripts

  1. SeaClearly says:

    “Mueller has not reported anything,” tweeted [supposed] journalist Soledad O’Brien to thousands of likes and retweets in response to Tulsi Gabbard’s post. “Why does anyone support this idiotic lady?”

    “These are the arguments that the narrative managers have taught them to make.” Correction/Translation: “These are exact examples of scripted arguments that narrative managers send down/over for them to make.”

    “Lazy writing”? Wrong. Again, “These are exact examples of scripted arguments that narrative managers send down/over for them to make.”

    As far as another unnecessary atheistic knife thrust toward Jesus Christ and Christians (which you insert into every possible post, whether relevant to the subject or not) through mocking the “Easter Bunny”: Why do we never see you mocking Muslims, Taoists, Jews, Buddhists, etc.?

    The Democratic Money Behind Russia-gate

    In April 2016 the DNC and the Clinton campaign paid its Washington lawyer Marc Elias to hire Fusion GPS to unearth dirt connecting Trump to Russia. This was three months before the DNC blamed Russia for hacking its computers and supposedly giving its stolen emails to WikiLeaks to help Trump win the election.

    The … sources that originated the allegations claiming that Russia meddled in the 2016 election — without providing [any] evidence — were both paid for by the Democratic National Committee [and] the Clinton campaign: the Steele dossier and the CrowdStrike analysis of the DNC servers. Think about that for a minute.

    We have long known that the DNC did not allow the FBI to examine its computer server for clues about who may have hacked it – or even if it was hacked – and instead turned to CrowdStrike, a private company co-founded by a virulently anti-Putin Russian. Within a day, CrowdStrike blamed Russia on dubious [or fabricated] evidence.

    [And then, as planned, all true “resistance” against the controlled narrative/PsyOp became labeled as] either willful Russian propagandists or “useful idiots” [thus rendering them “Fair Game”].

    The [pre-planned and pre-scripted] intent of [those] lists [and coordinated tactics was] clear: [First,] shut down dissenting voices.

  2. SeaClearly says:

  3. SeaClearly says:

    A key official goal is to drive them close to the poverty line for the rest of their lives – rendered unemployable for all but low-paid jobs.

  4. […] enough (of those who were not blind or awakened) saw that It Was All Covered Under Lies Through Scripted Actors with Staged Acts, the (star chambered) conspirators continued their onslaught, completely emboldened – for the […]

  5. SeaClearly says:

    WMD: “More and More Massive”

    It’s looking more and more massive. The intelligence agencies initiated reports that Donald Trump was colluding with Russia, they nurtured them and helped them grow, and then they spread the word to the press and key government officials.

    Although the corporate press accuses Trump of conspiring with Russia to stop Hillary Clinton, the reverse now seems to be the case: the Obama administration intelligence agencies worked with Clinton to block “Siberian candidate” Trump.

    But evidence [was] lacking. Other pieces were meanwhile clicking into place. In late May or early June 2016, Fusion GPS, a private Washington intelligence firm employed by the DNC, hired Steele to look into the Russian angle.

    To create an audit trail back to those [Clinton] emails from someone in the campaign … so they could develop a stronger case for probable cause to continue to issue warrants and to further an investigation.” — “to build something that did not exist.”

  6. SeaClearly says:

    Reflection: What is left to be trusted?

    What we read?
    What we hear?
    What we see?

  7. SeaClearly says:

    We Are At War With Russia!!!

  8. SeaClearly says:

    In relation, yes, the elections are rigged. 2000 was clear. But, when nothing was done by the Democrats (refusing to fight even with proof) after the undeniable “clarity” of what happened in 2004/Ohio, that was the point of everything being cemented:
    Ohio 2004 Election Case Study:
    “On Election night, GOP-controlled Miami County announced a total turnout of 31,620 votes, with a majority of about 66% favoring George W. Bush. Later, the Board of Elections added nearly 19,000 votes to the total, about 13,000 of which went to Bush. The second tabulation gave John Kerry precisely the same percentage of the vote as the first one, another virtual statistical impossibility.”

  9. SeaClearly says:

    And, one historical (“batshit crazy”) video coincides for the full effect:

  10. SeaClearly says:

    Just turn the following quote (and everything else) around:
    From “Biden has been vocal about his desire to ‘confront China’s economic abuses, counter its aggressive, coercive actions, push back on China’s attack on human rights, intellectual property, and global governance.’”
    to “Putin (or, Xi Jinping) has been vocal about his desire to ‘confront the U.S.’ economic abuses, counter its aggressive, coercive actions, push back on their attack on human rights, intellectual property, and global governance.’”
    How would the U.S. react? War! War! War! They declared War! We are preparing to First Strike with nuclear weapons! Total world casualties may be 95%, but, by God, they declared War!

  11. Sea Clearly says:

    Modus Operandi (2003): 1) Create the “facts” you want to refer to for worldwide presentation (even if through “enhanced interrogation”). 2) Have those “facts” “leaked” or published. 3) Refer to those “facts” on the world stage (with the referencing as cover). “The British Government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa.” Modus Operandi (perfected) (2021): The Guardian‘s publication of straight out, fabricated, propaganda by Luke Harding begins making its rounds, worldwide. Now, we can “assess” these actions as “apparent confirmation[s]” of “potentially compromising” methods, “appearing” to destabilize the world – or, so it “seems.”

    “[W]e’re flagging problematic posts for Facebook.” But, this means … among other things, that you are admitting absolute collusion and control (of at least all major social media). (When did this start?)
    US Gov To Censor Your Private Text Messages For “Misinformation”:
    But, this means … among other things, that you are admitting absolute collusion and control (where you can, without a warrant, see all the text messages of everyone on the planet). (When did this start?)

    A Final Warning

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s